Discussion
According to James Rachels :
Answer: D
Rachels holds that the distinction between active and passive euthanasia on the ground of moral acceptability is worth questioning.
In 'Active and Passive Euthanasia' (1975), James Rachels argues that killing is not in itself morally worse than letting die. With his Smith and Jones example, where one drowns a child and the other merely lets him drown, he shows the bare difference carries no moral weight, so the medical doctrine allowing passive but forbidding active euthanasia is questionable.
The other options state one side of the distinction he challenges, rather than his conclusion.
No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…
Post your comment
Please log in or register to post a comment.
Examination Categories
- SSC Exams
- Banking Exams
- Teaching Exams
- Civil Services Exams
- Railways Exams
- Engineering Recruitment Exams
- Defence Exams
- State Government Exams
- Police Exams
- Insurance Exams
- Nursing Exams
- Other Government Exams
- NRA CET
- PG Entrance Exams
- Campus Placement
- MBA Entrance Exams
- CUET and UG Entrance
- Judiciary Exams
- Regulatory Body Exams
- Software Development