Machine-translated by Google. Questions are authored in English.
Top

Discussion

An engineer finds that an attitude solution drifts noticeably only when the airframe is subject to sustained high frequency vibration, and is accurate otherwise.

What should be suspected?

  • A.An accelerometer bias
  • B.Incorrect magnetic variation
  • C.Poor coning compensation
  • D.A failed magnetometer

Answer: C

Correct answer: Poor coning compensation

The signature is diagnostic: drift appears only under sustained high frequency vibration and is absent otherwise. That is coning - simultaneous oscillation about two axes producing a systematic attitude drift, because finite rotations do not commute and a naive integration cannot recover the true attitude change over a cycle.

The compensation term must be computed at a rate well above the vibration frequencies; if it is inadequate or the loop too slow, the error appears exactly when vibration is present. An accelerometer bias or wrong variation would produce a steady error regardless of vibration, and a failed magnetometer would affect heading only.

No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…

Post your comment

Please log in or register to post a comment.