Machine-translated by Google. Questions are authored in English.
Top

Discussion

Shand (1927) grouped igneous rock based on the total molar alkali verse alumina content. Which condition will be suitable in case of Pre-aluminous ?

  • A.Al\(_{2}\)O\(_{3}\) < (Na\(_{2}\)O + K\(_{2}\)O)
  • B.Al\(_{2}\)O\(_{3}\) > (CaO + Na\(_{2}\)O + K\(_{2}\)O)
  • C.Al\(_{2}\)O\(_{3}\) < (CaO + Na\(_{2}\)O + K\(_{2}\)O) but Al\(_{2}\)O\(_{3}\) > (Na\(_{2}\)O + K\(_{2}\)O)
  • D.Al\(_{2}\)O\(_{3}\) = (Na\(_{2}\)O + K\(_{2}\)O)

Answer: B

The condition for peraluminous ('Pre-aluminous') rocks is Al2O3 > (CaO + Na2O + K2O), in molar proportions.

Shand's alumina saturation scheme compares molar alumina with the alkalis and lime:

  1. Peraluminous: Al2O3 greater than CaO + Na2O + K2O; the excess alumina appears as muscovite, cordierite or garnet, as in S-type granites.
  2. Metaluminous: Al2O3 less than CaO + Na2O + K2O but greater than Na2O + K2O; the third option.
  3. Peralkaline: Al2O3 less than Na2O + K2O; the first option, with sodic amphiboles or pyroxenes.

Equality of alumina and alkalis is only the boundary between metaluminous and peralkaline.

No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…

Post your comment

Please log in or register to post a comment.