Machine-translated by Google. Questions are authored in English.
Top

Discussion

Assertion (A): Hard defences can cause the loss of saltmarsh in front of them.
Reason (R): Rising sea level would move the marsh landward but the defence prevents it.

  • A.Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A
  • B.A is true but R is false
  • C.A is false but R is true
  • D.Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A

Answer: D

Correct answer: Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A

Both are true and the reason describes coastal squeeze. A saltmarsh survives sea level rise by moving landward, and a defence at its back removes that possibility, so the marsh narrows and eventually disappears - taking with it the wave attenuation it provided to the defence itself. The defence therefore destroys part of its own protection, which is one of the strongest arguments for realignment.

No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…

Post your comment

Please log in or register to post a comment.