Machine-translated by Google. Questions are authored in English.
Top

Discussion

The Information Technology Act, 2000, distinguishes between civil liability and criminal liability in cases of misuse of computer resources. In which of the following situations would such conduct attract criminal punishment rather than mere compensation ?

  • A.When the damage to computer resources exceeds a prescribed monetary limit
  • B.When the affected party chooses to initiate criminal proceedings
  • C.When access to a computer system is without permission, irrespective of intent
  • D.When the act is done dishonestly or fraudulently in addition to unauthorised access

Answer: D

Criminal liability arises when the act is done dishonestly or fraudulently in addition to unauthorised access.

Section 43 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 lists acts such as accessing, downloading from or damaging a computer system without the owner's permission, and makes the wrongdoer liable to pay compensation. Section 66 turns the same acts into an offence, punishable with imprisonment up to three years or fine up to five lakh rupees or both, when they are done dishonestly or fraudulently in the sense of the penal law.

So the dividing line is the mental element, not the size of the loss or the victim's choice of forum. Access without permission and without that intent stays within civil compensation.

No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…

Post your comment

Please log in or register to post a comment.