Machine-translated by Google. Questions are authored in English.
Top

Discussion

Ashok Debbarma @ Achak Debbarma Vs. State of Tripura is the case related to

  • A.Punishment for using prohibited arms or prohibited ammunition
  • B.Punishment for using firearm or an imitation firearms
  • C.Punishment for purchasing illegal arms
  • D.All of the above

Answer: A

The case relates to punishment for using prohibited arms or prohibited ammunition.

Ashok Debbarma @ Achak Debbarma v State of Tripura, decided by the Supreme Court in 2014, arose from a Tripura case in which the Arms Act charge was under section 27(3), the clause that punishes the use of prohibited arms or ammunition in contravention of section 7 where it causes death.

The use of firearms or imitation firearms to resist arrest and the buying of arms from an unlicensed person are separate offences in other sections of the Act, and the case is not about them. Because those sections are different, option D, all of the above, is also wrong.

No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…

Post your comment

Please log in or register to post a comment.