Machine-translated by Google. Questions are authored in English.
Top

Discussion

Assertion (A) : Consumer Surplus is the difference between the potential price and actual price.

Reason (R) : There exists an inverse relationship between the price and consumer surplus.
Codes :

  • A.Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A).
  • B.Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
  • C.(A) is true, but (R) is false.
  • D.(A) is false, but (R) is true.

Answer: B

Both statements are true, but the reason does not explain the assertion. Consumer surplus is indeed the gap between the price a consumer is willing to pay (the potential price) and the price actually paid, which is the assertion.

The reason, that price and consumer surplus move in opposite directions, is also true, but it states a consequence and not the meaning of the surplus. So the second code is right. The first fails because R is not the definition, and the other two wrongly call one statement false.

No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…

Post your comment

Please log in or register to post a comment.