Machine-translated by Google. Questions are authored in English.
Top

Discussion

In the 87Rb -87Sr isotopic systematics applied to terrestrial rocks, the slope of the isochron \((e^{\lambda t} - 1)\) can be approximated as \(\lambda t\), where \(\lambda\) is the decay constant and \(t\) is time. Choose the correct option that justifies this approximation.

  • A.\(^{87}\)Rb decays to \(^{87}\)Sr following a linear law
  • B.The Rb/Sr ratio is susceptible to alteration in terrestrial rocks
  • C.\(\lambda\) is very small for \(^{87}\)Rb
  • D.Age of the Earth > half-life of \(^{87}\)Rb

Answer: C

The approximation holds because \(\lambda\) is very small for \(^{87}\)Rb.

The exponential can be expanded as a series, and when \(\lambda t\) is small every term after the second is negligible:

\[ \begin{aligned} e^{\lambda t} &= 1 + \lambda t + \tfrac{(\lambda t)^2}{2} + \cdots \\ e^{\lambda t} - 1 &\approx \lambda t \end{aligned} \]

For \(^{87}\)Rb, \(\lambda \approx 1.42 \times 10^{-11}\) per year, so even for the age of the Earth, about \(4.5 \times 10^{9}\) years, \(\lambda t\) is only about 0.064 and the squared term is about 0.002.

The decay itself is exponential, not linear, so the first option is false. Alteration of the Rb/Sr ratio affects whether an isochron is valid, not this algebra. The last option is the wrong way round: the half-life of \(^{87}\)Rb, about 49 billion years, is far longer than the age of the Earth, which is exactly why \(\lambda t\) stays small.

No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…

Post your comment

Please log in or register to post a comment.