Machine-translated by Google. Questions are authored in English.
Top

Discussion

Is it necessary to separately define Z and Y parameters as Z can be obtained from Y and vice a versa ?

I. Not necessary to define Y and Z separately as Y = 1/Z.
II. Necessary as Z-parameters cannot be defined at high frequency.
III. Y = 1/Z is applicable only at low frequency, so conversion is not valid under all conditions.
IV. Hybrid \(\pi\)-model enables Z to be determined using Z = 1/Y.

  • A.Options I and III are correct.
  • B.Options II and IV are correct.
  • C.Options III and IV are correct.
  • D.Options IV and I are correct.

Answer: B

The key marks II and IV as the correct statements. The reasoning behind the key is that the two sets of parameters are not interchangeable in every case: the Z-parameters are defined by open-circuit conditions, which cannot be realised at high frequency, where the open-circuited port has stray capacitance and the test condition fails, and the hybrid pi model gives a direct way to obtain Z from the admittance form of the device. The statement that Y and Z need not be defined separately because Y = 1/Z is not accepted, since for a two-port the matrices are inverses only if the inverse exists, and the statement that conversion is not valid at low frequency is the reverse of what applies. I could not verify every step of the key's argument from a standard text, so the answer rests on the official key. The answer is that options II and IV are correct.

No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…

Post your comment

Please log in or register to post a comment.