Machine-translated by Google. Questions are authored in English.
Top

Reading Comprehension Questions and Answers

Direction for [ Question No: 871 To 872 ] :

The greatest thing this age can be proud of is the birth of man in the consciousness of men. In his drunken orgies of power and national pride man may flout and jeer at it. when organised national selfishness, racial antipathy and commercial self seeking begin to display their ugly deformities in all their nakedness, then comes the time for man to know that his salvation is not in political organisations and extended trade relations, not in any mechanical re-arrangement of the social system but in a deeper transformation of life, in the liberation of consciousness in love, in the realisation of God in man.

871.

In the phrase “the birth of Man in the consciousness of men”, Man stands for

Answer: D

Correct answer: an idealistic notion of the human self

The capital letter marks the difference: men are the individuals in whose consciousness something is born, and Man is the ideal of humanity being born there. That ideal is what the passage says the age can be proud of, and what people jeer at in their orgies of power.

Please log in or register to report this question.

872.

People jeer at the 'birth of Man' in the human consciousness when they

Answer: B

Correct answer: become power hungry

The passage says man may flout and jeer at it in his drunken orgies of power and national pride. Power and pride are the two conditions named, and the drunkenness is a metaphor for them rather than a state of mind of its own.

Please log in or register to report this question.

Direction for [ Question No: 873 To 877 ] :

Modern economics does not differentiate between renewable and non-renewable materials, as its method is to measure everything by means of a money price. Thus, taking various alternative fuels, like coal, oil, wood or water power: the only difference between them recognised by modern economics is relative cost per equivalent unit. The cheapest is automatically the one to be preferred, as to do otherwise would be irrational and 'uneconomic'. From a Buddhist point of view of course this will not do, the essential difference between non-renewable fuels like coal and oil on the one hand and renewable fuels like wood and water power on the other cannot be simply overlooked. Non-renewable goods must be used only if they are indispensable, and then only with the greatest care and the highest concern for conservation. To use them carelessly or extravagantly is an act of violence, and while complete non-violence may not be possible on earth, it is nonetheless the duty of man to aim at deal of non-violence in all he does.

873.

Which of the following statements may be assumed to be false from the information in the passage?
1.The writer finds the attitude of modern economists towards natural resources to be uneconomic.
2.Buddhist economists are in different to the cost of fuels
3.To use oil on non-essentials is contrary to the Buddhist economic philosophy
4.To fell a tree is an act of violence not permitted by Buddhist economists
Of the above statements

Answer: B

Correct answer: 1, 2 and 4 are false

Statement 1 is false because it is the Buddhist, not the writer's modern economist, who would call careless use uneconomic; the modern economist calls it economic. Statement 2 is false because Buddhist economics does not ignore cost, it simply refuses to let cost be the only measure. Statement 4 is false because wood is named as a renewable fuel that may properly be used. Only statement 3 holds: using oil on non-essentials is exactly what the passage forbids.

Please log in or register to report this question.

Answer: B

Correct answer: using non-renewable sources

The passage says non-renewable goods must be used only if they are indispensable, and then only with the greatest care. That is a restriction on non-renewables specifically, not a rejection of money, of development, or of measuring anything at all.

Please log in or register to report this question.

Answer: D

Correct answer: differentiate between two economic philosophies

The passage is built as a comparison: first what modern economics does with fuels, then what a Buddhist point of view requires instead. The distinction between renewable and non-renewable materials and the concern for conservation are the substance of the second philosophy, not the purpose of the passage.

Please log in or register to report this question.

876.

Fill in the blanks with the appropriate pair of phrases:
The passage suggests that while a modern economist, considers it uneconomic to use ...... form of fuel, a Buddhist economist considers it uneconomic to use ...... form a fuel

Answer: C

Correct answer: an expensive, a non-renewable

For the modern economist the only measure is cost, so the uneconomic fuel is simply the dearer one. For the Buddhist economist the measure is whether the fuel can be replaced, so the uneconomic fuel is the non-renewable one, however cheap. The pair has to keep that contrast in the right order.

Please log in or register to report this question.

Answer: D

Correct answer: there is no alternative fuel available

The passage says such fuels must be used only if they are indispensable, and indispensable means that nothing else will serve. Plentiful supply is beside the point, since the objection is to exhausting a stock rather than to scarcity, and relative cost is the measure the Buddhist view sets aside.

Please log in or register to report this question.

Direction for [ Question No: 878 To 880 ] :

Sometimes we went off the road and on a path through the pine forest. The floor of the forest was soft to walk on; the frost did not harden it as it did the road. But we did not mind the hardness of the road because we had nails in the soles and heels; the nails bit on the frozen ruts and with nailed boots it was good walking on the road and invigorating. It was lovely walking in the woods.

Answer: C

Correct answer: wheel marks in which frost had become hard

A rut is a groove worn in a road by wheels, and frozen says the frost has set hard in it. That is why the road was hard while the forest floor was soft: the frost hardened the one and not the other.

Please log in or register to report this question.

Answer: A

Correct answer: the frost did not harden it as it did the road

The passage gives the reason in the same sentence: the floor was soft to walk on because the frost did not harden it as it did the road. The boots and the nails explain why the hard road was bearable, not why the forest floor was soft.

Please log in or register to report this question.

Answer: A

Correct answer: we had nailed boots on

The passage says we did not mind the hardness of the road because we had nails in the soles and heels. What follows - that the walking was good and invigorating - is the result of that footing, not the reason for it.

Please log in or register to report this question.

Loading…
Tags: Reading Comprehension Questions and Answers || Reading Comprehension MCQ Questions and Answers || Reading Comprehension GK Questions and Answers || Reading Comprehension GK MCQ Questions || Reading Comprehension Multiple Choice Questions and Answers || Reading Comprehension GK || GK on Reading Comprehension || English Language Questions and Answers || English Language MCQ Questions and Answers || English Language GK Questions and Answers || GK on English Language