Antenna Measurements Questions and Answers

Q: What is a polar plot of an antenna pattern?

A polar plot puts angle around the circle and level along the radius, which shows the shape of the beam and the positions of the lobes in a directly intuitive way. A rectangular plot of level against angle shows fine detail and low side lobes better, so both are used. Polarisation comparison, spherical geometry and Smith charts are different presentations entirely. Two presentations of the same data serving different purposes is common and worth expecting.

Q: When is a rectangular pattern plot preferred to a polar one?

A rectangular plot gives every angle equal width and can be expanded independently in level and in angle, which makes it far better for reading side lobe levels against a specification mask. A polar plot conveys the shape of the beam more immediately. Audience and angular coverage are not the criteria. Choosing between two correct presentations according to what must be read from them is a small skill that materially affects how useful a report is.

Q: Why must a range's source be stable in amplitude during a measurement?

The pattern is a record of received level against angle, so a slow drift in the source is indistinguishable from a genuine variation in the antenna's response. A reference channel monitoring the source and normalising the measurement removes the problem entirely. Receivers tolerate amplitude variation, polarisation is set by orientation, and the far field condition depends on geometry. Any instability that is correlated with the measurement will be mistaken for data.

Q: Why is a receiver rather than a spectrum analyser often used on an antenna range?

A narrowband tuned receiver rejects noise outside its bandwidth and reaches a dynamic range of eighty or ninety decibels, which a general purpose analyser typically does not. Coherent receivers also give phase, which near field scanning requires, though that is an additional capability rather than the general reason. Analysers do reach microwave frequencies and can be triggered externally. Instrument choice follows from the dynamic range the measurement actually demands.

Q: What sets the noise floor of a pattern measurement?

The lowest level that can be recorded is set by thermal noise in the receiver's bandwidth together with any interference or residual reflection present, and narrowing the bandwidth or averaging lowers the first of these. Chamber temperature is essentially fixed, antenna gain raises signal and noise alike, and sample count affects resolution rather than the floor. Knowing which of several possible limits is binding tells you which change would actually improve the measurement.

Q: How can the dynamic range of a pattern measurement be improved?

Reducing the noise bandwidth and raising the signal both improve the ratio between the wanted level and the floor, provided stray reflections are not already the limit. More samples improve angular resolution but not the floor, moving closer violates the far field condition, and a broader source antenna increases stray illumination. Improving a measurement requires attacking whichever term dominates, which is why identifying the limit comes before changing anything.

Q: What does averaging repeated sweeps achieve in a pattern measurement?

Random noise falls as the square root of the number of averages, so four sweeps buy six decibels of floor, at the cost of measurement time. Systematic reflections repeat identically and survive averaging untouched, which is why they set the ultimate limit. Resolution follows from the sample spacing, and drift needs a reference channel. Averaging helps only against the random part of the error, which is worth remembering before spending hours on it.

Q: What is a systematic error in an antenna measurement?

A systematic error shifts every reading the same way, so it cannot be averaged out and must be identified and corrected or included in the uncertainty. Cable loss, mismatch and range reflections are typical examples. Origin within the system, small size and frequency dependence are characteristics some systematic errors happen to have rather than definitions. The distinction from random error governs which technique will reduce it, which is why it is drawn so carefully in metrology.

91.

What is a polar plot of an antenna pattern?

A.A plot showing only the region near the poles of the sphere
B.A plot of impedance on a Smith chart against frequency
C.Level plotted against angle around a circle
D.A plot of the two polarisations against one another

Answer: C

A polar plot puts angle around the circle and level along the radius, which shows the shape of the beam and the positions of the lobes in a directly intuitive way. A rectangular plot of level against angle shows fine detail and low side lobes better, so both are used. Polarisation comparison, spherical geometry and Smith charts are different presentations entirely. Two presentations of the same data serving different purposes is common and worth expecting.

Discuss in Forum

92.

When is a rectangular pattern plot preferred to a polar one?

A.When the shape of the main beam is the only quantity of interest
B.When the pattern is being shown to a non technical audience
C.When the measurement covers less than ninety degrees of angle
D.When low side lobes over a wide angular range must be examined

Answer: D

A rectangular plot gives every angle equal width and can be expanded independently in level and in angle, which makes it far better for reading side lobe levels against a specification mask. A polar plot conveys the shape of the beam more immediately. Audience and angular coverage are not the criteria. Choosing between two correct presentations according to what must be read from them is a small skill that materially affects how useful a report is.

Discuss in Forum

93.

Why must a range's source be stable in amplitude during a measurement?

A.Any drift appears as a change in the measured pattern
B.The receiver cannot lock to a signal that varies in amplitude
C.Amplitude variation changes the polarisation of the transmitted wave
D.The far field condition depends on the transmitted power level

Answer: A

The pattern is a record of received level against angle, so a slow drift in the source is indistinguishable from a genuine variation in the antenna's response. A reference channel monitoring the source and normalising the measurement removes the problem entirely. Receivers tolerate amplitude variation, polarisation is set by orientation, and the far field condition depends on geometry. Any instability that is correlated with the measurement will be mistaken for data.

Discuss in Forum

94.

What is a reference channel used for in a pattern measurement?

A.Recording the positioner angle alongside the received level
B.Normalising out variation in the source and the instrumentation
C.Providing the phase reference needed for near field scanning
D.Measuring the cross polar response at the same time as the co-polar

Answer: B

Sampling the transmitted signal and dividing the received level by it removes source drift, cable variation and instrument gain changes, since they affect both channels equally. It is the same ratio principle that makes substitution gain measurement accurate. Phase reference is one important use of it in coherent systems, but the general purpose is normalisation. Making a measurement a ratio rather than an absolute level is the most reliable defence against drift there is.

Discuss in Forum

95.

Why is a receiver rather than a spectrum analyser often used on an antenna range?

A.A receiver measures phase whereas an analyser measures only amplitude
B.A spectrum analyser cannot be synchronised with a positioner
C.A tuned receiver offers greater sensitivity and dynamic range
D.A spectrum analyser cannot be tuned to microwave frequencies

Answer: C

A narrowband tuned receiver rejects noise outside its bandwidth and reaches a dynamic range of eighty or ninety decibels, which a general purpose analyser typically does not. Coherent receivers also give phase, which near field scanning requires, though that is an additional capability rather than the general reason. Analysers do reach microwave frequencies and can be triggered externally. Instrument choice follows from the dynamic range the measurement actually demands.

Discuss in Forum

96.

What sets the noise floor of a pattern measurement?

A.The physical temperature of the anechoic chamber during the test
B.The gain of the antenna under test at its main beam peak
C.The number of angular points recorded during the pattern sweep
D.Receiver noise in the measurement bandwidth and any stray signals

Answer: D

The lowest level that can be recorded is set by thermal noise in the receiver's bandwidth together with any interference or residual reflection present, and narrowing the bandwidth or averaging lowers the first of these. Chamber temperature is essentially fixed, antenna gain raises signal and noise alike, and sample count affects resolution rather than the floor. Knowing which of several possible limits is binding tells you which change would actually improve the measurement.

Discuss in Forum

97.

How can the dynamic range of a pattern measurement be improved?

A.Narrow the receiver bandwidth and raise the transmitted power
B.Increase the number of angular samples taken during the sweep
C.Move the antenna closer to the source to raise the signal level
D.Use a broader beam source antenna to illuminate more evenly

Answer: A

Reducing the noise bandwidth and raising the signal both improve the ratio between the wanted level and the floor, provided stray reflections are not already the limit. More samples improve angular resolution but not the floor, moving closer violates the far field condition, and a broader source antenna increases stray illumination. Improving a measurement requires attacking whichever term dominates, which is why identifying the limit comes before changing anything.

Discuss in Forum

98.

What does averaging repeated sweeps achieve in a pattern measurement?

A.It compensates for drift in the source amplitude over time
B.It lowers the random noise floor as the square root of the count
C.It removes systematic reflections from the chamber walls
D.It improves the angular resolution of the recorded pattern

Answer: B

Random noise falls as the square root of the number of averages, so four sweeps buy six decibels of floor, at the cost of measurement time. Systematic reflections repeat identically and survive averaging untouched, which is why they set the ultimate limit. Resolution follows from the sample spacing, and drift needs a reference channel. Averaging helps only against the random part of the error, which is worth remembering before spending hours on it.

Discuss in Forum

99.

Why does averaging not remove a chamber reflection?

A.Averaging works only on signals that are periodic in angle
B.The reflection changes phase between sweeps and so accumulates
C.The reflection is present identically in every sweep
D.The reflection is stronger than the receiver can average out

Answer: C

Averaging suppresses contributions that vary randomly from one measurement to the next, whereas a fixed reflection is part of the deterministic signal and appears in every sweep with the same amplitude and phase. Only changing the geometry, adding absorber or time gating removes it. Strength, periodicity and phase drift are not the issue. Distinguishing random from systematic error decides which of the available remedies will work at all.

Discuss in Forum

100.

What is a systematic error in an antenna measurement?

A.One that arises from the measurement system rather than the antenna
B.One that is too small to matter compared with the random errors
C.One that appears only at certain frequencies within the band
D.One that repeats identically and biases the result in one direction

Answer: D

A systematic error shifts every reading the same way, so it cannot be averaged out and must be identified and corrected or included in the uncertainty. Cable loss, mismatch and range reflections are typical examples. Origin within the system, small size and frequency dependence are characteristics some systematic errors happen to have rather than definitions. The distinction from random error governs which technique will reduce it, which is why it is drawn so carefully in metrology.

Discuss in Forum

Loading…

Topics

Other Subjects

Tags: Antenna Measurements Questions and Answers || Antenna Measurements MCQ Questions and Answers || Antenna Measurements GK Questions and Answers || Antenna Measurements GK MCQ Questions || Antenna Measurements Multiple Choice Questions and Answers || Antenna Measurements GK || GK on Antenna Measurements || Antenna and Wave Propagation Questions and Answers || Antenna and Wave Propagation MCQ Questions and Answers || Antenna and Wave Propagation GK Questions and Answers || GK on Antenna and Wave Propagation

Antenna Measurements Questions and Answers

Topics

Other Subjects

About Us

Stay informed about all important Dates & Notifications