Typedef Questions and Answers

Q: The type of linked list in which the node does not contain any pointer or reference to the previous node is _____________

Correct answer: Singly linked listA singly linked list gives each node one pointer, to the next node only. There is no way back, so traversal is forward from the head and a node cannot be deleted without a reference to its predecessor.A doubly linked list adds a pointer to the previous node, which costs memory but allows backward traversal and deletion given only the node itself. The circular variants differ in whether the last node points back to the first, which is independent of how many pointers each node carries.

Q: typedef declaration:

Correct answer: Both a & bThe two statements are the same fact expressed twice. A typedef introduces no new type, only an additional name for one that already exists, and the two names are completely interchangeable thereafter. Nothing at compile time distinguishes a variable declared through the alias from one declared through the original type.

Q: Which option should be selected to work the following C expression? string p = "HELLO";

Correct answer: typedef char *string;A string in C is a pointer to its first character, so the alias must be a pointer type: typedef char *string; lets string p = "HELLO"; assign the literal’s address to p. The array form is not merely wrong syntax - even typedef char string[]; would give an incomplete type that cannot be initialised this way.

Q: Are the properties of i, j and x, y in the following program same? typedef unsigned long int uli; uli i, j; unsigned long int x, y;

Correct answer: Yesuli is an alias for unsigned long int, not a new type, so i and j have exactly the same type, size, alignment and range as x and y. They are interchangeable in every context, and no compiler diagnostic distinguishes them. The alias exists purely for readability.

Q: Local variables are stored in an area called ___________

Correct answer: StackLocal variables have automatic storage duration: created on entry to their block and destroyed on exit. A stack matches that pattern exactly, since the most recently created is always the first to be destroyed.Allocation therefore costs only an adjustment of the stack pointer, which is why automatic variables are far cheaper than heap blocks. The same mechanism is why returning the address of a local is a fault - the storage is reclaimed as the function returns.

Q: What is the size of myArray in the code shown below? (Assume that 1 character occupies 1 byte) typedef char x[10]; x myArray[5];

Correct answer: 50 bytestypedef char x[10]; makes x mean “array of 10 char”. So x myArray[5]; declares an array of five such arrays, which is 5 × 10 = 50 characters, or 50 bytes. This nesting is why an array typedef is worth reading carefully: the new dimension is prepended, not appended.

Q: Is there any difference in the #define and typedef in the following code? typedef char * string_t; #define string_d char *; string_t s1, s2; string_d s3, s4;

Correct answer: YesThere is a real difference, and it appears at the second declaration of each pair. string_t s1, s2; makes both pointers, because the alias is a single type. string_d s3, s4; expands textually to char * s3, s4;, which makes s3 a pointer and s4 a plain char. The macro also leaves a stray semicolon from its own definition.

21.

typedef int (*PFI)(char *, char *)creates ___________

A.type PFI, for pointer to function (of two char * arguments) returning int
B.error
C.type PFI, function (of two char * arguments) returning int
D.type PFI, for pointer

Answer: A

Correct answer: type PFI, for pointer to function (of two char * arguments) returning int

Read the declarator from the name outward, respecting the parentheses. PFI is inside (*PFI), so it is a pointer; the (char *, char *) that follows makes it a pointer to a function taking two char *; and the leading int gives the return type. Without the parentheses, int *PFI(char *, char *) would instead be a function returning int *.

Discuss in Forum

22.

What is the essential difference between typedef and a #define macro for naming a type ?

A.There is no difference
B.typedef is handled by the compiler and respects scope, while #define is a textual substitution by the preprocessor
C.typedef works only for structures
D.#define is checked for type correctness but typedef is not

Answer: C

Correct answer: typedef is handled by the compiler and respects scope, while #define is a textual substitution by the preprocessor

Because typedef is part of the language proper it obeys the usual scoping rules and handles complex declarations correctly. A macro merely pastes text, which is why a #define for a pointer type applies the star to only the first name in a multiple declaration.

Discuss in Forum

23.

The type of linked list in which the node does not contain any pointer or reference to the previous node is _____________

A.Circularly singly linked list
B.Singly linked list
C.Circular doubly linked list
D.Doubly linked list

Answer: B

Correct answer: Singly linked list

A singly linked list gives each node one pointer, to the next node only. There is no way back, so traversal is forward from the head and a node cannot be deleted without a reference to its predecessor.

A doubly linked list adds a pointer to the previous node, which costs memory but allows backward traversal and deletion given only the node itself. The circular variants differ in whether the last node points back to the first, which is independent of how many pointers each node carries.

Discuss in Forum

24.

typedef declaration:

A.Does not create a new type
B.It merely adds a new name for some existing type.
C.Both a & b
D.None of the mentioned

Answer: C

Correct answer: Both a & b

The two statements are the same fact expressed twice. A typedef introduces no new type, only an additional name for one that already exists, and the two names are completely interchangeable thereafter. Nothing at compile time distinguishes a variable declared through the alias from one declared through the original type.

Discuss in Forum

25.

Point out the error in the following code?

typedef struct
{
    int data;
    NODEPTR link;
}*NODEPTR;

A.Error: in *NODEPTR
B.Error: typedef cannot be used until it is defined
C.No error
D.None of above

Answer: B

Correct answer: Error: typedef cannot be used until it is defined

Inside the braces, the member NODEPTR link; uses a name that the typedef has not yet introduced - the alias only comes into existence at the semicolon ending the whole declaration. The remedy is the pattern of the previous question: declare typedef struct node *NODEPTR; first, using a tag, and then define the structure.

Discuss in Forum

26.

Which option should be selected to work the following C expression?

string p = "HELLO";

A.typedef char [] string;
B.typedef char *string;
C.typedef char [] string; and typedef char *string;
D.Such expression cannot be generated in C

Answer: B

Correct answer: typedef char *string;

A string in C is a pointer to its first character, so the alias must be a pointer type: typedef char *string; lets string p = "HELLO"; assign the literal’s address to p. The array form is not merely wrong syntax - even typedef char string[]; would give an incomplete type that cannot be initialised this way.

Discuss in Forum

27.

Are the properties of i, j and x, y in the following program same?

typedef unsigned long int uli;
uli i, j;
unsigned long int x, y;

A.Yes
B.No

Answer: A

Correct answer: Yes

uli is an alias for unsigned long int, not a new type, so i and j have exactly the same type, size, alignment and range as x and y. They are interchangeable in every context, and no compiler diagnostic distinguishes them. The alias exists purely for readability.

Discuss in Forum

28.

Local variables are stored in an area called ___________

A.Heap
B.Permanent storage area
C.Free memory
D.Stack

Answer: D

Correct answer: Stack

Local variables have automatic storage duration: created on entry to their block and destroyed on exit. A stack matches that pattern exactly, since the most recently created is always the first to be destroyed.

Allocation therefore costs only an adjustment of the stack pointer, which is why automatic variables are far cheaper than heap blocks. The same mechanism is why returning the address of a local is a fault - the storage is reclaimed as the function returns.

Discuss in Forum

29.

What is the size of myArray in the code shown below? (Assume that 1 character occupies 1 byte)

typedef char x[10];
x myArray[5];

A.5 bytes
B.10 bytes
C.40 bytes
D.50 bytes

Answer: D

Correct answer: 50 bytes

typedef char x[10]; makes x mean “array of 10 char”. So x myArray[5]; declares an array of five such arrays, which is 5 × 10 = 50 characters, or 50 bytes. This nesting is why an array typedef is worth reading carefully: the new dimension is prepended, not appended.

Discuss in Forum

30.

Is there any difference in the #define and typedef in the following code?

typedef char * string_t;
#define string_d char *;
string_t s1, s2;
string_d s3, s4;

A.Yes
B.No

Answer: A

Correct answer: Yes

There is a real difference, and it appears at the second declaration of each pair. string_t s1, s2; makes both pointers, because the alias is a single type. string_d s3, s4; expands textually to char * s3, s4;, which makes s3 a pointer and s4 a plain char. The macro also leaves a stray semicolon from its own definition.

Discuss in Forum

Loading…

Topics

Other Subjects

Tags: Typedef Questions and Answers || Typedef MCQ Questions and Answers || Typedef GK Questions and Answers || Typedef GK MCQ Questions || Typedef Multiple Choice Questions and Answers || Typedef GK || GK on Typedef || C Programming Questions and Answers || C Programming MCQ Questions and Answers || C Programming GK Questions and Answers || GK on C Programming

Typedef Questions and Answers

Topics

Other Subjects

About Us

Stay informed about all important Dates & Notifications