Machine-translated by Google. Questions are authored in English.
Top

Discussion

Why is a large aperture usually measured on a near field range rather than a far field one?

  • A.The near field measurement is inherently more accurate than a far field one
  • B.The antenna cannot be rotated safely enough to make a far field measurement
  • C.Near field ranges need no anechoic treatment and so are much cheaper to build
  • D.The far field distance would require an impractically long range

Answer: D

Because the far field begins at two D squared over lambda, a large aperture at microwave frequencies needs a range of hundreds of metres or kilometres, which is rarely available. Scanning a probe over a plane close to the aperture and transforming the result gives the far field pattern indoors. The method is not intrinsically more accurate, rotation is not the difficulty, and a near field range still needs careful absorber treatment. It is a case of substituting computation for physical distance.

No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…

Post your comment

Please log in or register to post a comment.