Machine-translated by Google. Questions are authored in English.
Top

Discussion

Assertion:

The supreme court "ordered a ban on registration of private non-commercial vehicles without Euro II emission norms in the national capital region (NCR) from April 1, 2000, to control the growing pollution".

RI. The rate of pollution now has become a threat to human life.

RII. So far, private non-commercial vehicles have been registered without Euro II emission norms in the NCR.

  • A.Only RI and not RII is the reason for the assertion.
  • B.only RII and not RI is the reason for the assertion.
  • C.either RI or RII, but not both, is the reason for the assertion.
  • D.neither RI nor RII is the reason for the assertion.

Answer: A

Correct answer: Only RI and not RII is the reason for the assertion.

The court acted because the danger had become serious enough to warrant it, which is what RI states - pollution now threatens life. RII merely records the position that obtained until then; the fact that such vehicles had been registered describes the situation the order changed rather than the reason for changing it. So only RI is the reason.

No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…

Post your comment

Please log in or register to post a comment.