Machine-translated by Google. Questions are authored in English.
Top

Discussion

Which of the following is not a reason to prefer a strapdown mechanisation?

  • A.It removes gimbal bearings and motors
  • B.It reduces mechanical wear
  • C.It moves the transformation into software
  • D.It avoids the need for coning and sculling compensation

Answer: D

Correct answer: It avoids the need for coning and sculling compensation

This is not a reason to prefer strapdown - it is the opposite. Coning and sculling compensation exist because the sensors are fixed to a vibrating airframe and the attitude integration must be done numerically; a gimballed platform, isolated from the airframe and mechanically maintaining its orientation, does not need them.

The genuine advantages are the other three: removing gimbal bearings, torque motors and slip rings, reducing mechanical wear accordingly, and moving the coordinate transformation into software, where it is cheap once processors are fast enough.

No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…

Post your comment

Please log in or register to post a comment.