Machine-translated by Google. Questions are authored in English.
Top

Discussion

The five Golden Principles with respect to Circumstantial Evidence were laid down in which Supreme Court Judgment ?

  • A.Sharad Birdhichand Sarda v. State of Maharashtra, 1984 AIR 1622
  • B.Dudh Nath Pandey v. State of U.P., 1981 SCC (2) 166
  • C.Vasa Chandrasekhar Rao v. Ponna Satyanarayana & Anr., 2000 AIR SC 2138
  • D.Dr. Sunil Clifford Daniel v. State of Punjab (2012) 11 SCC 205

Answer: A

The principles were laid down in Sharad Birdhichand Sarda v. State of Maharashtra (1984).

Deciding a murder case resting wholly on circumstantial evidence, the Supreme Court set out five conditions, which it called the 'panchsheel' of proof: the circumstances must be fully established; they must be consistent only with the hypothesis of guilt; they must be of a conclusive nature and tendency; they must exclude every hypothesis except the one to be proved; and the chain of evidence must be so complete as to leave no reasonable ground for a conclusion consistent with innocence.

Courts cite Sharad Birdhichand Sarda as the source of the five-point test. The other three judgments are not the decision that formulated it.

No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…

Post your comment

Please log in or register to post a comment.