Machine-translated by Google. Questions are authored in English.
Top

Discussion

If we define pratyaksa as jñāna what type of fallacy would be committed ?

  • A.Viruddha
  • B.Sāṁkarya
  • C.Ativyāpti
  • D.Avyāpti

Answer: C

If pratyaksa is defined as jnana, the definition commits the fallacy of ativyapti, so the answer is C.

A definition commits ativyapti (over-extension) when it covers more than the thing defined. Jnana, knowledge, includes inference, comparison and testimony as well as perception, so a definition of perception as knowledge applies to cases that are not perception.

Avyapti (D) is the opposite, a definition that covers too little. Viruddha (A) and sankarya (B) are not the names of these defects of definition in this sense.

No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…

Post your comment

Please log in or register to post a comment.