Machine-translated by Google. Questions are authored in English.
Top

Discussion

Which of the following is true about the Buddhist theory of Anumāna ?

(1) Hetu is Trilakṣaṇātmaka
(2) Vyāpti is derived from tādātmya and tadutpatti
(3) Anupalabdhi anumāna is a variety of anumana
(4) Asatpratipaksatva is one of the conditions of good hetu

Options :

  • A.(1), (2) and (4)
  • B.(2), (3) and (4)
  • C.(1), (2) and (3)
  • D.(1), (3) and (4)

Answer: C

The true statements about the Buddhist theory of inference are (1), (2) and (3).

(1) For Diṅnāga and Dharmakīrti, a valid reason (hetu) has three marks (trairūpya): it is present in the subject, present in similar cases and absent from dissimilar cases. (2) Dharmakīrti grounds invariable concomitance in identity (tādātmya) or causality (tadutpatti). (3) Non-apprehension (anupalabdhi) is one of his three kinds of valid reason, with identity and effect.

(4) is false for the Buddhists: absence of a counter-balancing reason (asatpratipakṣatva) is one of the five marks of a good reason in Nyāya, which adds it and non-contradiction to the Buddhist three.

No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…

Post your comment

Please log in or register to post a comment.