Discussion
Parmenides rejects the reality of :
Answer: D
Parmenides rejects all of them: All of the above.
Parmenides argued that only Being is, and non-being is not and cannot even be thought. From this he concluded that Being is one, eternal, unchanging and motionless. Change would require something to come from or pass into non-being; motion would require empty space, which is non-being; and multiplicity would require something (non-being) to separate the many things.
So motion, multiplicity and change are all, for Parmenides, illusions of the senses, and choosing any one alone would leave out the other two.
No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…
Post your comment
Please log in or register to post a comment.
Examination Categories
- SSC Exams
- Banking Exams
- Teaching Exams
- Civil Services Exams
- Railways Exams
- Engineering Recruitment Exams
- Defence Exams
- State Government Exams
- Police Exams
- Insurance Exams
- Nursing Exams
- Other Government Exams
- NRA CET
- PG Entrance Exams
- Campus Placement
- MBA Entrance Exams
- CUET and UG Entrance
- Judiciary Exams
- Regulatory Body Exams
- Software Development