Machine-translated by Google. Questions are authored in English.
Top

Discussion

Assertion (A): DNS based failover is slower to take effect than load balancer health checks.
Reason (R): Resolvers and clients cache records for the duration of the time to live.

  • A.Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A
  • B.Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A
  • C.A is true but R is false
  • D.A is false but R is true

Answer: A

Correct answer: Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A

Both are true and the reason gives the mechanism. A DNS change only takes effect once the cached record expires, and resolvers and client libraries hold it for the time to live - some ignoring low values and holding longer. A load balancer removes an unhealthy target from rotation within seconds and needs no client to re-resolve anything, which is why DNS failover is used across regions and load balancers within them.

No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…

Post your comment

Please log in or register to post a comment.