Machine-translated by Google. Questions are authored in English.
Top

Discussion

Assertion (A): Proof testing is used for critical ceramic components despite destroying some of them.
Reason (R): A component that survives a known overload cannot contain a flaw larger than a calculable size.

  • A.Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A
  • B.Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A
  • C.A is true but R is false
  • D.A is false but R is true

Answer: A

Correct answer: Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A

Both are true and the reason gives the logic. Fracture mechanics relates strength to flaw size, so surviving a known stress proves that no flaw above the corresponding size is present. That is a guarantee no amount of sampling can give, and it is why the deliberate destruction of the weakest pieces is accepted for components whose failure would be serious.

No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…

Post your comment

Please log in or register to post a comment.