Machine-translated by Google. Questions are authored in English.
Top

Discussion

Consider a two-way classification model \(y_{ij} = \mu + \tau_{i} + \beta_{j} + \varepsilon_{ij}\) \(i = 1 \ldots v\), \(j = 1, \ldots, b\) with \(E(\varepsilon_{ij}) = 0\), \(\mathrm{Var}(\varepsilon_{ij}) = \sigma^{2}\), \(\varepsilon_{ij}\) uncorrelated where \(\tau_{i}\ \delta = 1 \ldots v\) are fixed effects and \(\beta_{j}\ j = 1, \ldots, b\) are random effects with mean 0 and variance \(\sigma_{\beta}^{2}\). Hence the hypothesis regarding the insignificance of random effects is :

  • A.\(H_{0} : \beta_{1} = \beta_{2} = \cdots = \beta_{b}\)
  • B.\(H_{0} : \sigma_{\beta}^{2} = 0\)
  • C.\(H_{0} : \tau_{1} = \tau_{2} = \cdots = \tau_{v}\)
  • D.\(H_{0} : \sigma^{2} = 0\)

Answer: B

The hypothesis is \(H_{0} : \sigma_{\beta}^{2} = 0\).

In a mixed model the block effects \(\beta_{j}\) are random variables drawn from a population with variance \(\sigma_{\beta}^{2}\). Interest is in that population, not in the particular blocks observed, so 'no block effect' means the random effects have no variability: \(\sigma_{\beta}^{2} = 0\).

\(\beta_{1} = \cdots = \beta_{b}\) is the hypothesis for fixed effects, \(\tau_{1} = \cdots = \tau_{v}\) concerns the fixed treatment effects, and \(\sigma^{2} = 0\) would mean no experimental error at all.

No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…

Post your comment

Please log in or register to post a comment.