Machine-translated by Google. Questions are authored in English.
Top

Discussion

Assertion (A): Lanchester's phugoid formula contains neither the wing area nor the pitching moment of inertia of the aeroplane.

Reason (R): The idealised phugoid is derived by assuming a lossless exchange between kinetic and potential energy at constant lift coefficient.

Select the correct answer from the options below.

  • A.A is true but R is false
  • B.A is false but R is true
  • C.Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A
  • D.Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A

Answer: C

Both are true and the second explains the first. Lanchester's derivation treats the aeroplane as a point mass trading height for speed with lift held proportional to the square of the speed at fixed incidence; no rotation about the pitch axis enters, so inertia in pitch cannot appear, and wing area cancels with the weight through the trim condition. What survives is \( \omega_n = \sqrt{2}\,g/u_0 \), a function of trim speed alone. It also explains the formula's limitation: having thrown away the loss mechanism, it says nothing about damping.

No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…

Post your comment

Please log in or register to post a comment.