Machine-translated by Google. Questions are authored in English.
Top

Discussion

An aeroplane's short period has \( \omega_n = 4.0 \ \mathrm{rad/s} \) and \( \zeta = 0.5 \). Loading it further aft lowers the frequency to \( 2.5 \ \mathrm{rad/s} \) while the real part of the root is unchanged. The new damping ratio is

  • A.0.80
  • B.0.31
  • C.0.50
  • D.1.25

Answer: A

The real part is \( \sigma = \zeta\omega_n = 0.5 \times 4.0 = 2.0 \ \mathrm{s^{-1}} \), and it is given as unchanged, so

\[ \begin{aligned} \zeta_{2} &= \frac{\sigma}{\omega_{n2}} \\ &= \frac{2.0}{2.5} = 0.80 \end{aligned} \]

The damping ratio therefore rises to 0.80 as the frequency falls. This is the standard trade with aft loading, and it explains an apparent paradox in flight test: an aeroplane can feel better damped and worse controlled at the same time. 0.31 scales the wrong way. 0.50 assumes damping ratio is a fixed property, which it is not. 1.25 is the frequency ratio rather than the damping ratio.

No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…

Post your comment

Please log in or register to post a comment.