Machine-translated by Google. Questions are authored in English.
Top

Discussion

A design team must choose between a 15 per cent larger tailplane and a 1.5 m rear fuselage extension to gain the same tail volume.

Which consideration most favours the fuselage extension?

  • A.Its lower manufacturing cost
  • B.The extra cabin or hold volume it also provides
  • C.Its lower wetted area
  • D.Its smaller effect on the centre of gravity

Answer: B

Correct answer: The extra cabin or hold volume it also provides

Both options buy the same tail volume, so the choice turns on what else each brings. A fuselage extension adds usable length - another seat row, or more hold - which is revenue the tail area cannot generate.

The other claims do not hold. A fuselage plug is generally the more expensive change, since it disturbs systems routing and the structure; a 1.5 m barrel section has more wetted area than 15 per cent of a tailplane; and the extension moves the tail's mass further aft, shifting the centre of gravity more, not less.

No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…

Post your comment

Please log in or register to post a comment.