Discussion
A quick access recorder can be used in place of the mandatory crash protected recorder. Is this correct?
Answer: A
Correct answer: No, it has no crash protection at all
The mandatory requirement exists so that data survives an accident, and a recorder in an ordinary enclosure would not survive the impact, the fire or the immersion.
Recording the right parameters is not sufficient, which is why the second option fails. Nor does aircraft size change the requirement. The QAR is valuable for what it is - easily downloaded data for routine monitoring - and its accessibility is exactly what makes it unsuitable as the protected record.
No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…
Post your comment
Please log in or register to post a comment.
Examination Categories
- SSC Exams
- Banking Exams
- Teaching Exams
- Civil Services Exams
- Railways Exams
- Engineering Recruitment Exams
- Defence Exams
- State Government Exams
- Police Exams
- Insurance Exams
- Nursing Exams
- Other Government Exams
- NRA CET
- PG Entrance Exams
- Campus Placement
- MBA Entrance Exams
- CUET and UG Entrance
- Judiciary Exams
- Regulatory Body Exams
- Software Development