Machine-translated by Google. Questions are authored in English.
Top

Discussion

If \(\bar{q}\) denotes velocity field of an incompressible fluid in motion, then the mass conservation will not imply :

  • A.\(\nabla\bar{q} = 0\)
  • B.\(\dfrac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} + \nabla\bar{q} = 0\)
  • C.\(\dfrac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} + \nabla(\rho\bar{q}) = 0\)
  • D.\(\nabla \times \bar{q} = 0\)

Answer: D

Mass conservation does not imply \(\nabla \times \bar{q} = 0\).

The equation of continuity is \(\partial\rho/\partial t + \nabla \cdot (\rho\bar{q}) = 0\). For an incompressible fluid with constant density this reduces to \(\nabla \cdot \bar{q} = 0\), and \(\partial\rho/\partial t = 0\) gives the form in option B as well. So A, B and C all follow from conservation of mass.

\(\nabla \times \bar{q} = 0\) says the flow is irrotational. That is a separate kinematic property, not a consequence of mass conservation: a rigid rotation \(\bar{q} = (-y, x, 0)\) is incompressible but has vorticity 2.

No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…

Post your comment

Please log in or register to post a comment.