Machine-translated by Google. Questions are authored in English.
Top

Discussion

Which of the meaning given for the maxim "Actus me invite factus non est mens actus" is correct ?

  • A.Merely a voluntary act by me will not be a crime with a criminal intention.
  • B.An act done by me against my will is not my act.
  • C.Neither I nor my person can be held liable for an act done under compulsion.
  • D.All of them.

Answer: B

The maxim means that an act done by me against my will is not my act.

Actus me invito factus non est meus actus says that an act done against one's will is not one's own act. It applies to an act done under physical compulsion, as when one is pushed.

The first option mixes the maxim with the rule on mens rea. The third is wider than the maxim, because it speaks of any compulsion and of liability, but the maxim is about an act done against the will. So the correct meaning is the second option.

No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…

Post your comment

Please log in or register to post a comment.