Machine-translated by Google. Questions are authored in English.
Top

Discussion

What is the primary critique of Subaltern school regarding the discipline of history ?

  • A.Traditional historical narratives are lacking in a proper methodology of history
  • B.Traditional historical narratives are focused on political history alone
  • C.Traditional historical narratives marginalized certain groups of people
  • D.Traditional historical narratives are not scientific enough

Answer: C

The Subaltern critique is that Traditional historical narratives marginalized certain groups of people.

The Subaltern Studies group, launched by Ranajit Guha in 1982, argued that both colonialist and nationalist histories of India were elitist: they told the story through elites and left out the peasants, workers, tribals and other subordinate groups, whose own politics they sought to recover.

Their quarrel was not that earlier histories lacked method or scientific rigour, or that they dealt only with politics, but that they silenced the subaltern.

No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…

Post your comment

Please log in or register to post a comment.