Machine-translated by Google. Questions are authored in English.
Top

Discussion

In.............., the Supreme Court held that a Criminal Injuries Compensation Board should be established for the award of compensation whether or not conviction has taken place.

  • A.Vishaka Vs. State of Rajasthan
  • B.Delhi Domestic Working Women's Forum Vs. U.O.I.
  • C.Chairman, Railway Board Vs. Chandrima Das
  • D.Nilabati Behera V. State of Orissa

Answer: B

The case is Delhi Domestic Working Women's Forum v Union of India.

In this 1995 case, arising from the rape of six domestic servants by army personnel on a train, the Supreme Court laid down guidelines for helping rape victims and directed the setting up of a Criminal Injuries Compensation Board. Compensation was to be awarded by the court on conviction, and by the Board whether or not a conviction had taken place.

Vishaka (1997) laid down guidelines on sexual harassment at the workplace. Chandrima Das (2000) awarded compensation to a foreign national raped by railway employees, and Nilabati Behera (1993) recognised public-law compensation for custodial death.

No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…

Post your comment

Please log in or register to post a comment.