Machine-translated by Google. Questions are authored in English.
Top

Discussion

The essential difference between a parliamentary and a presidential system is that in a parliamentary system

  • A.The executive is drawn from and answerable to the legislature
  • B.The head of state is elected directly by the people
  • C.There is no written constitution
  • D.The judiciary appoints the executive

Answer: D

Correct answer: The executive is drawn from and answerable to the legislature

In a parliamentary system the executive is drawn from the legislature and remains collectively responsible to it, so a government that loses the confidence of the House must resign. Powers are fused rather than separated. In a presidential system, as in the United States, the executive is separately elected, is not a member of the legislature, and cannot be removed by it except through impeachment for specified offences. Powers are separated and checked. The other features follow from this. A parliamentary system has a nominal head of state and a real head of government - in India the President and the Prime Minister - whereas a presidential system combines both in one office. A parliamentary executive has no fixed term; a presidential one does. The framers chose the parliamentary model chiefly because India was already familiar with it from the Government of India Acts, and because they valued day-to-day accountability over the stability a fixed term provides.

No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…

Post your comment

Please log in or register to post a comment.