Discussion
__________ is a judicial philosophy that courts can and should go beyond applicable law to consider the broader societal implications of their decisions.
Answer: D
Judicial activism is the philosophy that courts can and should go beyond the applicable law and consider the broader social effects of their decisions. Judicial restraint is the opposite view, that courts should limit themselves to applying the law and defer to the legislature. Judicial review is the power of a court to examine the constitutionality of laws, and judicial philosophy is a general term and not a name for this specific approach. So the answer is judicial activism.
No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…
Post your comment
Please log in or register to post a comment.
Examination Categories
- SSC Exams
- Banking Exams
- Teaching Exams
- Civil Services Exams
- Railways Exams
- Engineering Recruitment Exams
- Defence Exams
- State Government Exams
- Police Exams
- Insurance Exams
- Nursing Exams
- Other Government Exams
- NRA CET
- PG Entrance Exams
- Campus Placement
- MBA Entrance Exams
- CUET and UG Entrance
- Judiciary Exams
- Regulatory Body Exams
- Software Development