Discussion
Statements: P = U < M> N; D ≥ P; I ≥ C
Conclusion:
I. D ≥ K
II. I > P
Answer: C
Correct answer: Only conclusion II is true, though the statements this depends on are damaged
The statements in this record have been corrupted. What survives reads “P = U < M> N; D ≥ P; I ≥ C”, where a stray < in the stored HTML has swallowed the text between M and N, and conclusion I speaks about an element K that appears nowhere in the statements at all - so at least one further relation, the one introducing K, has been lost with it.
What can still be said is limited. From \( D \ge P \) and \( P = U \) we know D stands at or above both P and U, but nothing connects D to K, so conclusion I cannot be established from what remains - consistent with the key, which treats it as not following. Conclusion II, \( I > P \), must have followed through the missing link: \( I \ge C \) is the only statement mentioning I, so the lost text has to have tied C to P strictly enough to give \( I > P \).
The item needs its original statements restored before the reasoning can be shown in full; unlike the two questions beside it, the damage here removed a relation rather than merely obscuring one, and it cannot be inferred from the surviving text.
Post your comment
Please log in or register to post a comment.
Examination Categories
- SSC Exams
- Banking Exams
- Teaching Exams
- Civil Services Exams
- Railways Exams
- Engineering Recruitment Exams
- Defence Exams
- State Government Exams
- Police Exams
- Insurance Exams
- Nursing Exams
- Other Government Exams
- NRA CET
- PG Entrance Exams
- Campus Placement
- MBA Entrance Exams
- CUET and UG Entrance
- Judiciary Exams
- Regulatory Body Exams
- Software Development