Machine-translated by Google. Questions are authored in English.
Top

Discussion

Statements:

F > G = H < I> J; K < L> M > N > H; H < B>

Conclusions:

(a) F > M (b) C > J

  • A.Only conclusion a follows
  • B.Only conclusion b follows 
  • C.Either conclusions a or b follows
  • D.Neither conclusion a nor b follows
  • E.Both conclusions a and b follows

Answer: D

Correct answer: Neither conclusion a nor b follows

What survives reads \( F > G = H < I \;?\; J \), \( K < L \;?\; M > N > H \) and \( H < B \;?\; \).

Conclusion (a) can be tested in full, and it fails. It claims \( F > M \). From the first statement \( F > G = H \), so F stands above H; from the second \( M > N > H \), so M stands above H as well. They are on separate branches rising from H, and nothing orders them: taking \( H = 1 \), both \( F = 2, M = 9 \) and \( F = 9, M = 2 \) satisfy every surviving statement. Does not follow.

Conclusion (b) claims \( C > J \), and C appears nowhere in the statements, so it cannot follow from them.

A note on this item: its statements have been damaged in this record. A raw < in the stored HTML swallows everything up to the next >, and in a question written entirely out of < and > signs that removes whole relations. The keyed answer stands, and conclusion (a) is demonstrable exactly as shown.

No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…

Post your comment

Please log in or register to post a comment.