Discussion
Why is a table driven agent impractical for most tasks?
Answer: A
The number of possible percept histories grows exponentially with the length of the agent's life, so even a chess playing table would need more entries than there are atoms in the observable universe. Lookup itself is fast, which is the only attraction of the design. Tables represent percept dependent behaviour perfectly well, and goal change is a separate objection. A design that is correct in principle and impossible in practice is still worth stating, because it defines what every real architecture is approximating.
No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…
Post your comment
Please log in or register to post a comment.
Examination Categories
- SSC Exams
- Banking Exams
- Teaching Exams
- Civil Services Exams
- Railways Exams
- Engineering Recruitment Exams
- Defence Exams
- State Government Exams
- Police Exams
- Insurance Exams
- Nursing Exams
- Other Government Exams
- NRA CET
- PG Entrance Exams
- Campus Placement
- MBA Entrance Exams
- CUET and UG Entrance
- Judiciary Exams
- Regulatory Body Exams
- Software Development