Discussion
What does the Chinese room argument attempt to show?
Answer: B
Searle imagines a person following rules to produce Chinese responses without understanding Chinese, arguing that the system displays the behaviour without the semantics, so passing a behavioural test does not establish understanding. The systems reply and other responses contest it vigorously. It says nothing about speed, about the possibility of language processing or about the merits of neural approaches. A thought experiment attacking a criterion rather than a capability is best answered by examining what the criterion was for.
No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…
Post your comment
Please log in or register to post a comment.
Examination Categories
- SSC Exams
- Banking Exams
- Teaching Exams
- Civil Services Exams
- Railways Exams
- Engineering Recruitment Exams
- Defence Exams
- State Government Exams
- Police Exams
- Insurance Exams
- Nursing Exams
- Other Government Exams
- NRA CET
- PG Entrance Exams
- Campus Placement
- MBA Entrance Exams
- CUET and UG Entrance
- Judiciary Exams
- Regulatory Body Exams
- Software Development