Discussion
What follows from omitting disjointness axioms in an ontology?
Answer: A
Without a statement that cats and dogs are disjoint, nothing prevents an individual from being both, and no negative conclusion about class membership can be drawn. Modellers consistently underestimate how many such axioms are needed. Inconsistency, classification failure and indistinguishability do not follow. That the absence of an axiom weakens conclusions silently, rather than producing an error, is what makes omissions of this kind so hard to notice.
No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…
Post your comment
Please log in or register to post a comment.
Examination Categories
- SSC Exams
- Banking Exams
- Teaching Exams
- Civil Services Exams
- Railways Exams
- Engineering Recruitment Exams
- Defence Exams
- State Government Exams
- Police Exams
- Insurance Exams
- Nursing Exams
- Other Government Exams
- NRA CET
- PG Entrance Exams
- Campus Placement
- MBA Entrance Exams
- CUET and UG Entrance
- Judiciary Exams
- Regulatory Body Exams
- Software Development