Machine-translated by Google. Questions are authored in English.
Top

Discussion

For \(k \in \mathbb{N}\), let \(E_{k}\) be a measurable subset of [0,1] with Lebesgue measure \(\frac{1}{k^{2}}\). Define

\[ \begin{aligned} E &= \bigcap_{n=1}^{\infty}\bigcup_{k=n}^{\infty}E_{k} \text{ and} \\ F &= \bigcup_{n=1}^{\infty}\bigcap_{k=n}^{\infty}E_{k} \end{aligned} \]

Consider the following statements:

P: Lebesgue measure of E is equal to zero.
Q: Lebesgue measure of F is equal to zero.

Then

  • A.both P and Q are TRUE
  • B.both P and Q are FALSE
  • C.P is TRUE but Q is FALSE
  • D.Q is TRUE but P is FALSE

Answer: A

Both P and Q are TRUE.

E is the lim sup of the sets \(E_{k}\), the points lying in infinitely many of them. Since

\[ \begin{aligned} \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} m(E_{k}) &= \sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{k^{2}} \\ &= \frac{\pi^{2}}{6} \lt \infty, \end{aligned} \]

the Borel-Cantelli lemma gives m(E) = 0. Directly, \(E \subseteq \bigcup_{k \ge n}E_{k}\), whose measure is at most \(\sum_{k \ge n}1/k^{2} \to 0\).

F is the lim inf, the points lying in all but finitely many \(E_{k}\). Every such point lies in infinitely many, so \(F \subseteq E\) and m(F) = 0 as well. The other options would need the series of measures to diverge.

No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…

Post your comment

Please log in or register to post a comment.