Machine-translated by Google. Questions are authored in English.
Top

Discussion

In a linear model \(Y_{4 \times 1} = X_{4 \times 3}\,\theta_{3 \times 1} + \epsilon_{4 \times 1}\) \(E(Y_{1}) = E(Y_{3}) = \theta_{1} + \theta_{2}\) and \(E(Y_{2}) = E(Y_{4}) = \theta_{1} - \theta_{3}\). Hence which of the following statement is true ?

  • A.\(\theta_{1}, \theta_{2}, \theta_{3}\) are all estimable
  • B.\(\theta_{1} + \theta_{2} + \theta_{3}\) is estimable
  • C.\(\theta_{1} + \theta_{3}\) is estimable
  • D.\(\theta_{2} + \theta_{3}\) is estimable

Answer: D

The estimable function is \(\theta_{2} + \theta_{3}\).

A linear function is estimable exactly when it is a linear combination of the expected observations. Here those are \(\theta_{1} + \theta_{2}\) and \(\theta_{1} - \theta_{3}\), so estimable functions have the form

\[ \begin{aligned} &a(\theta_{1} + \theta_{2}) + b(\theta_{1} - \theta_{3}) \\ &= (a + b)\theta_{1} + a\theta_{2} - b\theta_{3} \end{aligned} \]

For \(\theta_{2} + \theta_{3}\): \(a = 1\), \(b = -1\), \(a + b = 0\). It works, and \(E(Y_{1} - Y_{2}) = \theta_{2} + \theta_{3}\).

For \(\theta_{1} + \theta_{2} + \theta_{3}\): \(a = 1\), \(b = -1\) gives coefficient 0 for \(\theta_{1}\), not 1. For \(\theta_{1} + \theta_{3}\): \(a = 0\), \(b = -1\) gives \(-1\) for \(\theta_{1}\). The individual \(\theta\)'s are not estimable, since the design matrix has rank 2.

No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…

Post your comment

Please log in or register to post a comment.