Machine-translated by Google. Questions are authored in English.
Top

Discussion

If a relation is in third normal form, it does not need to be in second normal form.

  • A.
    True
  • B.False

Answer: B

Correct answer: False

The normal forms are cumulative: third normal form requires second, which requires first. A relation in third normal form is therefore already in second by definition, and the statement inverts that relationship entirely.

No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…

Post your comment

Please log in or register to post a comment.