Machine-translated by Google. Questions are authored in English.
Top

Discussion

Consider the two cascaded 2-to-1 multiplexers as shown in the figure.

Two cascaded 2-to-1 multiplexers: the first has input 0 tied to 0, input 1 connected to R and select line P; its output feeds input 1 of the second, whose input 0 is R-bar and whose select line is Q; the output of the second MUX is X

The minimal sum of products form of the output \(X\) is

  • A.\(\bar{P}\bar{Q} + PQR\)
  • B.\(\bar{P}Q + QR\)
  • C.\(PQ + \bar{P}\bar{Q}R\)
  • D.\(\bar{Q}\bar{R} + PQR\)

Answer: D

The output is \(X = \bar{Q}\bar{R} + PQR\).

A 2-to-1 MUX outputs input 0 when its select line is 0 and input 1 when it is 1. The first MUX outputs 0 when \(P = 0\) and \(R\) when \(P = 1\), so its output is \(PR\). The second MUX outputs \(\bar{R}\) when \(Q = 0\) and the first MUX's output \(PR\) when \(Q = 1\):

\[ X = \bar{Q}\bar{R} + Q(PR) = \bar{Q}\bar{R} + PQR \]

The two terms cannot be merged (one needs \(Q = 0\), the other \(Q = 1\)), so this is already minimal. Test values rule out the others: for \(P = 1, Q = 0, R = 0\) the circuit gives \(X = \bar{R} = 1\), but \(\bar{P}\bar{Q} + PQR\) and \(PQ + \bar{P}\bar{Q}R\) both give 0; for \(P = 0, Q = 1, R = 1\) the circuit gives 0, but \(\bar{P}Q + QR\) gives 1.

No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…

Post your comment

Please log in or register to post a comment.