Machine-translated by Google. Questions are authored in English.
Top

Discussion

In which judgment, the Hon'ble Supreme Court laid down that a complaint based on a second or successive dishonour of cheque is maintainable, if no complaint based on an earlier dishonour of cheque followed by statutory notice issued on the basis thereof had been filed;

  • A.(2013) 1 SCC 177, M.S.R.Leathors Vs. S.Palaniappan & Anr.
  • B.(1998) 6 SCC 514, Sadanandan Bhadran Vs. Madhavan Sunil Kumar.
  • C.(1999) 4 SCC 567, Sil Import USA Vs. Exim Aides Silk Exporters Bangalore.
  • D.(2004) 13 SCC 498, Krishna Exports & Ors. Vs. Raju Das.

Answer: A

The judgment is (2013) 1 SCC 177, M.S.R. Leathers Vs. S. Palaniappan & Anr.

In MSR Leathers a three-judge bench held that there is nothing in Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act that bars a prosecution based on a second or successive dishonour of the same cheque, so long as no complaint had been filed on an earlier dishonour followed by a statutory notice.

It overruled Sadanandan Bhadran v. Madhavan Sunil Kumar (1998), which had held that only one cause of action arises and a second notice on re-presentation cannot found a complaint. The other two cases did not decide this point.

No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…

Post your comment

Please log in or register to post a comment.