Discussion
import java.awt.*;
class Ticker extends Component
{
public static void main (String [] args)
{
Ticker t = new Ticker();
/* Missing Statements ? */
}
}
which two of the following statements, inserted independently, could legally be inserted into missing section of this code?
1.boolean test = (Component instanceof t);
2.boolean test = (t instanceof Ticker);
3.boolean test = t.instanceof(Ticker);
4.boolean test = (t instanceof Component);
Answer: D
(2) is correct because class type Ticker is part of the class hierarchy of t; therefore it is a legal use of the instanceof operator. (4) is also correct because Component is part of the hierarchy of t, because Ticker extends Component.
(1) is incorrect because the syntax is wrong. A variable (or null) always appears before the instanceof operator, and a type appears after it. (3) is incorrect because the statement is used as a method (t.instanceof(Ticker);), which is illegal.
Post your comment
Please log in or register to post a comment.
Examination Categories
- SSC Exams
- Banking Exams
- Teaching Exams
- Civil Services Exams
- Railways Exams
- Engineering Recruitment Exams
- Defence Exams
- State Government Exams
- Police Exams
- Insurance Exams
- Nursing Exams
- Other Government Exams
- NRA CET
- PG Entrance Exams
- Campus Placement
- MBA Entrance Exams
- CUET and UG Entrance
- Judiciary Exams
- Regulatory Body Exams
- Software Development