Machine-translated by Google. Questions are authored in English.
Top

Discussion

Design point outcomes for four aspect ratios at the same requirements.

Aspect ratioCruise \( T/W \)Wing weight indexDesign \( W/S \)
70.2351.005.4
90.2211.095.4
110.2131.215.4
130.2091.365.4

What does the table suggest about choosing aspect ratio?

  • A.Higher aspect ratio is always better
  • B.Aspect ratio does not affect thrust required
  • C.Wing weight is independent of aspect ratio
  • D.The thrust saving flattens while weight keeps growing

Answer: D

Correct answer: The thrust saving flattens while weight keeps growing

Compare the two columns. Going from aspect ratio 7 to 9 saves \( 0.014 \) in cruise \( T/W \) for a 9 per cent wing weight penalty; from 11 to 13 it saves only \( 0.004 \) for a further 15 per cent of weight. The benefit is diminishing while the cost accelerates.

This is why aspect ratio is not simply maximised, and why constraint analysis alone cannot choose it: the diagram shows the thrust saving but not the weight penalty, so the choice requires a weight and mission analysis to find where the two balance.

No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…

Post your comment

Please log in or register to post a comment.