Machine-translated by Google. Questions are authored in English.
Top

Discussion

Let \(X_{1}, X_{2}, \ldots, X_{2n+1}\) be a random sample from a uniform distribution on the interval (\(\theta - 1\), \(\theta + 1\)). Let

\(T_{1} = \overline{X}\) (sample mean on 2n + 1 observations)
\(T_{2} = \tilde{X}\) (sample median on 2n + 1 observations)
\(T_{3} = \dfrac{T_{1} + T_{2}}{2}\)

be three estimators of \(\theta\). Then which of the following statements is correct ?

  • A.\(T_{1}\) is consistent but \(T_{2}\) is not consistent for \(\theta\)
  • B.\(T_{1}\) is consistent for \(\theta\)
  • C.Only \(T_{1}\) is unbiased for \(\theta\)
  • D.\(T_{2}\) is sufficient statistic for \(\theta\)

Answer: B

The correct statement is that \(T_{1}\) is consistent for \(\theta\).

\(T_{1} = \overline{X}\) has mean \(\theta\) and variance \(\frac{1}{3(2n + 1)} \to 0\) (the uniform on an interval of length 2 has variance \(\frac{1}{3}\)), so it is consistent.

The others fail. The sample median is also consistent for the centre \(\theta\) of a symmetric distribution, so option A is wrong. By symmetry about \(\theta\), the mean, the median and their average are all unbiased, so 'only \(T_{1}\)' is wrong. The sufficient statistic for this family is the pair (smallest, largest observation), and the median is not sufficient.

No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…

Post your comment

Please log in or register to post a comment.