Machine-translated by Google. Questions are authored in English.
Top

Discussion

Let P(x, y) be a propositional function, then .................. is a tautology.

  • A.∃xP (x, y0) → ∀yP (x0, y), x0 is a fixed value from domain of x and y0 is a fixed value from domain of y
  • B.∃xP (x, y0) → ∃x ∀yP (x, y), y0 is a fixed value from domain of y
  • C.∃x∀y P(x, y) → ∀y∃x P(x, y)
  • D.∃x∀y P(x, y) → ∀yP (x0, y), x0 is a fixed value from domain of x

Answer: C

The tautology is ∃x∀y P(x, y) → ∀y∃x P(x, y).

If some single x0 makes P(x0, y) true for every y, then for each y there is certainly an x making P(x, y) true, namely that same x0. So the implication holds for every predicate P and every domain: it is valid.

The others can fail. In (A) and (B), knowing that P holds for some x at one fixed y0 says nothing about P at other values of y. In (D), ∃x∀y P(x, y) guarantees some x that works for all y, but not that the particular fixed value x0 is that x. The converse of the correct option, ∀y∃x → ∃x∀y, is also not valid, which is the usual trap.

No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…

Post your comment

Please log in or register to post a comment.