Machine-translated by Google. Questions are authored in English.
Top

Discussion

Which rule reasons from a false consequent backwards?

  • A.From two implications, infer the implication joining their ends
  • B.From a conjunction, infer either of its conjuncts separately
  • C.From an implication and the negation of its consequent, infer the negation of its antecedent
  • D.From an implication and its antecedent, infer its consequent directly

Answer: C

Modus tollens reasons backwards from a false consequent to a false antecedent, and is the rule underlying refutation and much of scientific method. Modus ponens is the forward direction, hypothetical syllogism chains implications and simplification extracts conjuncts. The backward direction being valid, while affirming the consequent is not, is an asymmetry worth being able to state precisely rather than merely recognising by example. Working one numerical case through both cases side by side fixes the distinction better than any rule of thumb.

No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…

Post your comment

Please log in or register to post a comment.