Machine-translated by Google. Questions are authored in English.
Top

Discussion

Why do minimal presentations of logic use few connectives?

  • A.The extra connectives cannot be given truth tables
  • B.Fewer cases must be considered in proofs about the logic
  • C.Formulas become shorter when fewer connectives are used
  • D.Additional connectives would make the logic inconsistent

Answer: B

A proof by induction over the structure of formulas needs one case per connective, so taking negation and disjunction as primitive and defining the rest makes every such proof shorter. Formulas themselves become longer rather than shorter. Consistency and truth functionality are unaffected. Reducing the primitives so that metatheoretical proofs are tractable, while retaining the full syntax as abbreviation, is a standard division between a logic's presentation and its use.

No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…

Post your comment

Please log in or register to post a comment.