Machine-translated by Google. Questions are authored in English.
Top

Discussion

Three schemes are compared for the same message bandwidth.

SchemeParameter variedNoise immunity
PAMAmplitudePoor
PWMDurationGood
PPMPositionGood

Which conclusion follows from the table?

  • A.Amplitude modulation would improve if its pulses were made narrower
  • B.Constant amplitude is what confers the immunity
  • C.A longer pulse duration always improves the noise immunity obtained
  • D.Immunity depends on the message bandwidth rather than on the scheme

Answer: B

Reading down the table, the two schemes holding amplitude constant are the two with good immunity, which identifies the mechanism rather than merely ranking the schemes. Duration is a varied parameter rather than a lever on immunity, the bandwidth is held equal across the comparison, and narrowing the pulses would not remove amplitude modulation's dependence on amplitude. A table read for the property the winners share is more informative than one read as a ranking.

No comment is present. Be the first to comment.
Loading…

Post your comment

Please log in or register to post a comment.