Discussion
Statement:
The police would allow the leader of the protestors to give a signed protest note at the gates of an embassy. Flags are allowed to be burnt, but the men in uniform are harsh with anyone who tries to set ablaze the Indian tricolor.
Conclusions:
I. The embassies are of foreign countries and are in India.
II. Those who want to protest against foreign countries do not burn Indian flags.
III. Burning flags of foreign countries is not an offence.
Answer: B
Correct answer: Only I and III follow
Conclusion I follows from the reference to burning flags at the gates of an embassy in a country where the Indian tricolour is the protected flag: the embassies must be foreign ones on Indian soil. Conclusion III follows from the police allowing such flags to be burnt. Conclusion II states what protestors choose to do, whereas the passage describes what the police permit - a different matter.
Post your comment
Please log in or register to post a comment.
Examination Categories
- SSC Exams
- Banking Exams
- Teaching Exams
- Civil Services Exams
- Railways Exams
- Engineering Recruitment Exams
- Defence Exams
- State Government Exams
- Police Exams
- Insurance Exams
- Nursing Exams
- Other Government Exams
- NRA CET
- PG Entrance Exams
- Campus Placement
- MBA Entrance Exams
- CUET and UG Entrance
- Judiciary Exams
- Regulatory Body Exams
- Software Development